Talking with my in-country coach, Thulasy, while I’ve been doing my two- (now three-) week stint in Lusaka, I was telling her about how I wanted to get back to the village and leave the OPPAZ office in the city where I was working a 9-to-5, working on reports that analyzed the data that I had collected in the village. I made the comment to her that it didn’t feel like I was “doing development,” since I could be in any office in any country doing what I was doing – I didn’t need to be in Africa if I was limited to the office all the time. That is where the attachment to the village and to the field is so important. It ties back in to Dorothy and to building and maintaining that connection to those who we actually are doing this for. Those people are real. And far from being helpless and dependent on aid, the life that they create with such little means is what truly inspires me.
Every day in the village I spent my time talking with women who quite literally run out of food and money for three or four months of the year. How do they and their families survive? Some get by on one meal a day. Some manage to find some limited low-paid piecework for some of the better-off farmers, in order to buy enough food for – again – a meal a day. Some get small loans from people within the community to buy food. Some live off of the charity of others who perhaps had a better harvest than they did. Somehow they get by – malnourished, hungry – but they survive. This is not few and far between. This is by and large the norm for the people in the villages in that area, and I would wager that it is true for the villages all over Zambia, and all over Africa. It seemed that no matter the variation in production amounts from their crops, most families felt the pinch of no food and no money during those last few months before crops were harvested.
These women and their families live close to the earth, tied to the earth. Their livelihoods depend on it, through what it yields to them in crops. Their houses are made of it, round walls built of poles, packed with mud, and crowned with thatch. They warm themselves and their food with it, burning charcoal or wood in fires. They complete all of their daily activities in it, for it is everywhere: floors are of dirt, maize and groundnuts are shelled while sitting on the ground, dishes are polished using the sandy earth, children romp and play amongst it, clothes and skin are covered in it, the wind whips and boils it up into dust storms that coat and spray everything. When I think of these people, I think of the earth, and how they make life in such conditions seem normal.
Should they be normal? What is it that should be changed, or improved? Obviously, people need to have food and money year-round. Water, health – also important. But should we be striving for every family to have cement or brick houses with iron sheet roofs? Should we be pushing for electricity to come to the area (30km off the road), for every family to collect electronics and furniture and gadgets to make life easy and comfortable? Is that progress? I can’t see it here. There are things that are more important.
To be continued…

These women and their families live close to the earth, tied to the earth. Their livelihoods depend on it, through what it yields to them in crops. Their houses are made of it, round walls built of poles, packed with mud, and crowned with thatch. They warm themselves and their food with it, burning charcoal or wood in fires. They complete all of their daily activities in it, for it is everywhere: floors are of dirt, maize and groundnuts are shelled while sitting on the ground, dishes are polished using the sandy earth, children romp and play amongst it, clothes and skin are covered in it, the wind whips and boils it up into dust storms that coat and spray everything. When I think of these people, I think of the earth, and how they make life in such conditions seem normal.

To be continued…